The Aurora Murders and Demonic Possession

Jesus casting out demons

Jesus casting out demons (Photo credit: Nick in exsilio)

This is a fascinating article written from a Roman Catholic viewpoint.  The author relates a reasoned, calm thought on the various stages of involvement in evil and demons.  I do think the ending is weak, particularly in leaving out any Scripture and mention of Jesus Christ.  This is somewhat implied.  However the article gives everyone who is willing to think about good and evil something to think about.

The Aurora Murders and Demonic Possession.

Categories: Controvery | Tags: , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

No one can offend you without your permission

“No one can offend you without your permission.”

English: Neal Boortz at a FairTax Rally

English: Neal Boortz at a FairTax Rally (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I heard that today on the radio listening to Neil Boortz.

We live in a world today that seems to think that there is a God-given, constitutional, moral RIGHT to never hear or see anything that offends them.  It’s as if everyone has developed a case of overly sensitive ears!

I’ve read the Bible –

I’ve read the constitution –

You have NO right not to hear things you don’t like.  You have no right to silence people you disagree with.  And the only way you can be offended is if you decide to give your permission by taking offense.

Jesus said offensive things to people.  Moses said offensive things to people.  God said offensive things to people.  And if you listen to enough people, you will find people today who say things that are offensive.

So what should you do?

1) You can become an offensive jerk like everyone else. – I do not recommend this but chances are someone already thinks that about you anyway.

2) You can engage in debate with the person about what they are saying. – Sometimes not possible and sometimes you don’t have the time.

3) You can ignore it. – One of my favorite methods.

4) You can listen to it and consider that what is being said might be true. – Often a good idea.

5) You can go to God and pray blessings for the person.  Excellent!

6) You can go to God and ask God to show your own flaws and ask for his guidance.  Again, excellent!

The Fruit of the Tree

The Fruit of the Tree (Photo credit: Josh Kenzer)

Remember that the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy,  peace, patience (long suffering – kjv), kindness, goodness, gentleness, faithfulness, and self control.

Categories: Controvery | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A god of no judgment

The best place to find criteria for talking about ethics and interpretation will be in Christian discourse itself… I take my stand with a quotation from an impeccably traditional witness, Augustine, who wrote, “Whoever, therefore, thinks that he understands the divine Scriptures or any part of them so that it does not build the double love of God and of neighbor does not understand it at all” (Christian Doctrine 1.35.40).

c. 1480

c. 1480 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

By this light, any interpretation of Scripture that hurts people, oppresses people, or destroys people cannot be the right interpretation, no matter how traditional, historical, or exegetically respectable.

I came across this quote recently from another blog.  While it may sound “nice” and “good” – I believe that it is fundamentally flawed.

The book of Jeremiah tells us that “The heart is deceitful above all things and beyond cure. Who can understand it?” (17:9)

Now that may hurt some people.  Most of us like to think that we are honest, that we have good intentions, that our hearts are pure.  I usually think I am a pretty good guy.  I try to be honest and obey the law and do good things.  I like to feel good about myself.

BUT – when I am really honest, when I truly examine my soul, I find that Jeremiah is right.  I am not really that honest.  I even lie to God on a regular basis (how dumb is that?) with prayers like, “God, the thing I want most is to follow you.”  I’m terrified that God will say one day, “Fine, if that is what you want the most, I want you to give up coffee, fast for 40 days, sell all your possessions and give them all away to the poor and follow me.”

We are not honest people.  If you have ever been pulled over by police for speeding, you know that they ask you a question like, “Do you know why I pulled you over?”  How many of you have answered that honestly?  “Yes office, you caught me on your radar gun.  If you have shot it at me last night though, you would have gotten me for 20 miles an hour over – not just 10.  And by the way, I didn’t use a turn signal as required by law and I tailgated the person in front of me.”

How about good intentions?  Do you have good intentions in everything you do?  At best, you might honestly say, “Sometimes” or “Well, they are not intentionally bad.”  Usually our intentions are neither good nor bad, they just are.  We are not thinking about glorifying God or helping others – we just want to get our own way.

Let jump to another thought. “ any interpretation of Scripture that hurts people” – Jesus made all kinds of hurtful statements.  John the baptizer called people a bunch of snakes.  Wow!  I guess we better cut those things out of the Bible.  It hurts people to be called out for sin and evil.  We can’t say anything that might make Hitler or Stalin feel bad.

Mussolini (left) and Hitler sent their armies ...

Mussolini (left) and Hitler sent their armies to North Africa and into Egypt against the British (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

If you take out all of the commands to REPENT and TURN FROM YOUR WICKED WAYS from the Bible, you are basically left with a bunch of stories and a message like, “I’m OK, you’re OK”.

Jesus Christ Crucifix

Jesus Christ Crucifix (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The Bible is clear – I’m not OK before God and you are not OK before God without God’s work and intervention.  In fact, we are so bad and so guilty – the only thing that would make it right is the death of Jesus Christ, the lamb slain before the foundations of the world.

Will God ever pass judgment?  Will God ever hold a person to account for their sins?  Will God be the one to decide right and wrong – will we continue to swallow the lie that was first told in the Garden of Eden, “You will not surely die,” the serpent said to the woman. “For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” (Genesis 3:4-5).

Categories: Bible Study, Controvery | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Shave and a Haircut – go to hel…

The Real Meaning of Leviticus 19:27-28

I believe that all scripture is inspired by God.  However, many passages ARE difficult to understand and can be misconstrued.  Paul wrote to study to show yourself approved unto God – rightly dividing or understanding the word of God.  Because this passage is used to discredit the Scriptures, it is important for believers to have a proper understanding of just what it is saying.

One of the most disgusting tactics used by those intent on destroying belief in the Scriptures is the taking of passages out of context, without proper study, and flinging them in other’s faces.  As an example, “You must not believe the Bible because Jesus says that if your eye causes you to sin – pluck it out.  You’ve already looked at pretty women – why haven’t you pulled your eye out?  Don’t you believe the Bible?”  This kind of infantile behavior is all too common and you probably cannot say anything to such a person.  The Bible warns against casting pearls before swine meaning, “If someone is intent on distorting your words and meaning, don’t argue.  It’s worthless.  Their mind is closed and facts won’t make any difference.”

Enjoy the study.

English: Group of Kohanim studying the Halacho...

English: Group of Kohanim studying the Halachot of Tumah and Taharah in anticipation of the coming of Moshiach. עברית: צוות כהנים עוסקים בלימוד הלכות טומאה וטהרה בצפייה לקראת ביאת המשיח. החל בכיוון השעון: פרץ הכהן, עמיחי הכהן, יעקב הכהן, יוסף הכהן, דוד הכהן, ויונתן הכהן (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Taken from – edited by standrewscumberland

Leviticus 19:27-28 says:

“(27) You shall not round the edge of your head, nor shall you destroy the edge of your beard. (28) And you shall not make a cutting for the dead in your flesh, nor shall you make a written tattoo upon you; I am YHWH.”

In these two verses we are forbidden to make four types of “cuttings”:

  • 1) Cutting the head or hair
  • 2) Cutting the face or beard
  • 3) Cutting the flesh
  • 4) Inscribing writing on the flesh

But what exactly is forbidden by these four commandments?  Are we really required to grow long Elvis-style side locks?  To understand these four commandments we must consider the meaning of the words in their immediate context as well as the broader context of the entire Old Testament and the ancient world in which the Bible was given.

The first commandment – rounding the side of one’s head.

This doesn’t mean that you cut your head but rather to cut your hair on your head. Specifically we are forbidden from rounding the “Pe’ah” of the head.

Pe’ah is often translated as corner or side-lock, but it actually has the meaning of “side” or “edge”. This is always the meaning of the word Pe’ah in hundreds of passages throughout the Scriptures such as “and for the second side of the tabernacle, on the north side (Pe’ah), twenty boards.” (Ex 26:20) and again” And the west side (Pe’ah) shall be the Great Sea, from the border as far as over against the entrance of Hamath. This is the west side (Pe’ah).” (Ezekiel 47:20).

To “round the edge of your head” means to cut off the hair around the sides of the head. Many folks think that this is talking about the pagan “bowl-cut”. A bowl-cut was an ancient hair-cut with pagan significance that was created by placing a round bowl on the head and cutting all the exposed hair.

However, when this command is repeated in Deuteronomy 14:1-2 we read: “…you shall not cut yourselves nor shall you place baldness between your eyes, for the dead.

Since most people don’t have hair “between the eyes” this phrase is usually understood as the hair on the front of the head above the eyes.  From this we learn two things from Deuteronomy 14.  First, we learn that the prohibition is not necessarily a bowl-cut, but making any baldness around the edges of the head. Second, we see that the prohibition is specifically dealing with mourning. That is, one is prohibited to make baldness in the head as an act of mourning “for the dead”. In ancient times, when someone died the surviving relatives were so distraught that they cut their skin until they bled and shaved bald spots on their head.

While cutting one’s hair may sound like a strange act of mourning to the modern reader, this was a common practice in the ancient world. In fact, the Scriptures even permits non-Israelites to perform this despised mourning practice in certain situations.  We read regarding the captive Gentile woman: “and she shall shave her head… and she shall cry over her mother and her father for a month of days” (Deuteronomy 21:12-14).  As an act of mercy, the Torah allows t

he heathen women to shave her head while she mourns her recently killed father and mother (cf. Deuteronomy 20:13-14).

That making bald spots on the head was a mourning practice is also mentioned by the prophets.  Amos 8:10 writes, “And I will turn your feasts into mourning, and all your songs into lamentation; and I will bring up sackcloth upon all loins, and baldness upon every head; and I will make it as the mourning for an only son, and the end thereof as a bitter day.”  Micah 1:16 says, “Make yourself bald, and shear yourself for the children of thy delight; enlarge your baldness as the vulture; for they are gone into captivity from thee.

In ancient times, making bald spots on the head was an act of mourning along with lamentation, rending of clothes and donning of sackcloth. Thus when we are forbidden in Leviticus 19 and Deuteronomy 14 to “round the side of your head” and “place baldness between your eyes… for the dead” the meaning is that we may not shave our head or any part thereof as an act of mourning or sadness. There is no implication in the commandment in Leviticus 19 that we must grow side locks or pony tails. The only thing prohibited in Leviticus 19:27a is to shave the side of the head as an act of mourning. Were one to shave their head for stylistic reasons their would be no prohibition whatsoever.

We have seen thus far that the Israelite is forbidden to make cuts in his flesh and shave parts of his head as acts of mourning “for the dead”. In Leviticus 21 there is a similar prohibition that specifically applies to the Kohanim (descendants of Aaron). In Leviticus 21 the Kohanim are forbidden from becoming ritually impure from the dead with the exception of their immediate relatives. After listing the relatives that the Kohen may become impure from, we read:

“(4) A man shall not become impurified by his people to defile him. (5) They shall not make bald a baldness in their head nor shall they shave the edge of their beard and in their flesh they shall not cut a cut.” (Leviticus 21:4-5)

The context of the passage is explicitly defiling oneself for the dead. In this case the Kohanim are forbidden from various mourning practices. Not only are they forbidden from coming in contact with the dead bodies of their deceased friends but they are also forbidden from defiling themselves by making bald spots on their heads, by shaving their beards, and by cutting their skin. We see here that three of the prohibitions found in Leviticus 19 and Dt 14 are repeated in Leviticus 21. In all three passages both the implicit and explicit contexts are that of mourning practices. Every ancient person knew that one cut one’s skin or shaved one’s head as an act of mourning and it was these acts of mourning that are being prohibited in Leviticus 19. While the idea of mourning by cutting flesh and shaving may not be obvious today, we have seen that the Bible takes it as a given that cutting one’s flesh and shaving one’s head are common ways of mourning along with crying and wearing sackcloth.

It is worth noting that the Nazir made a vow not to shave his head (Numbers 6:5). At the end of the period of abstention, the Nazir would shave his entire head: “And the Nazirite shall shave his consecrated head at the door of the tent of meeting, and shall take the hair of his consecrated head, and put it on the fire which is under the sacrifice of peace-offerings.” The reason the Nazir can  shave his entire head is because he’s not doing it as an act of mourning. In 2 Samuel 14:26 we read that Absalom, the son of King David, used to grow his hair long and then shave his head every year. Again, this was not an act of mourning and therefore it was permissible to shave the head.

The second commandment – shaving your beard.

Was shaving the beard was also a forbidden mourning rite? In other words, is the prohibition to shave the beard a general prohibition for all occasions or is it exclusively prohibited as an acts of mourning or sadness.

Perhaps the first clue regarding shaving one’s beard is the ritual purification of the “leper”. Leviticus 14:9 says: “And it shall be on the seventh day, that he shall shave all his hair off his head and his beard and his eyebrows, even all his hair he shall shave off; and he shall wash his clothes, and he shall bathe his flesh in water, and he shall be clean.” A person is required to shave his beard in certain situations and this is even an act of purification. Likewise, we read about the consecration of the Levites in Numbers 8:7: “And thus shalt thou do unto them, to cleanse them: sprinkle the water of purification upon them, and let them cause a razor to pass over all their flesh, and let them wash their clothes, and cleanse themselves.”  Again we see that shaving the beard and indeed all the hair is not only permissible but can be an act of purification. In contrast, the prohibition of Leviticus 19 is to shave the head or beard as an act of mourning!

There are many biblical passages that make it clear  that shaving the beard was an act of mourning in ancient times. In Jeremiah 41:5, we read about a group of pilgrims mourning the destruction of the Temple: “There came certain men from Shechem, from Shiloh, and from Samaria, eighty men, having their beards shaven and their clothes rent, and having cut themselves, with meal-offerings and frankincense in their hand to bring them to the house of YHWH.”  We see that these pilgrims were mourning and therefore tore their clothes, cut their skin, and shaved their beards.

The fact that shaving was an act of mourning may shed light on a passage that has often defied explanation. In 2 Samuel 9:1-4 we read that David sent emissaries to Hanun king of Amon to comfort him over the death of his father. For some reason Hanun became convinced that David’s emissaries had not come to comfort him but to spy out the land. In a strange act of retribution he decided to cut off half their beards and send them humiliated back to Israel. Thus we read:

“(2) …And David’s servants came into the land of the children of Amon. (3) But the princes of the children of Amon said unto Hanun their lord: ‘Do you think that David does honour your father, that he hath sent comforters to you? has not David sent his servants to thee to search the city, and to spy it out, and to overthrow it?’ (4) So Hanun took David’s servants, and shaved off the one half of their beards, and cut off their garments in the middle, even to their buttocks, and sent them away.

It always seemed strange that Hanun and his advisors would suspect David’s emissaries of being spies without any seeming justification. Even stranger was his reaction to discovering spies be that he cut off their beards. Bearing in mind that ancient peoples shaved off their beards as an act of mourning “for the dead”, it becomes clear why Hanun’s advisors doubted that David’s men  had come to pay condolences. Probably Hanun and his cronies sat in the royal court with torn clothes, cut skin, and shaven beards. When David’s men arrived with full beards Hanun’s advisors assumed they were not coming to mourn the dead king but to spy out the land. For were they really coming to mourn the king they would have shaven their beards. To teach them respect of the dead and humiliate them at the same time, Hanun ordered that half their beards be cut off!

In summation, Leviticus 19:27-28, Leviticus 21:4-5, Deuteronomy 14:1-2 prohibit 4 different acts of mourning. These are:

1) Making a bald spot on the head as an act of mourning

2) Shaving the beard as an act of mourning

3) Cutting the skin as an act of mourning

4) Writing on the skin as an act of mourning

Interestingly, the making of tattoos as an act of mourning is the most elusive in the list. It is only mentioned once in Leviticus 19:28 and then never alluded to again in the Bible. Reference is made to writing on the flesh as an act of dedication to YHWH (Isaiah 44:5), but never as an act of mourning. Yet the practice of inscribing the name of the dead loved one in a tattoo still exists to this very day. Recently this practice has come to the attention of the public when it was reported that New York firemen and policemen were inscribing tattoos on their flesh in memory of their deceased comrades.

English: Dead Man Incorporated tattoo.

English: Dead Man Incorporated tattoo. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I hope you enjoyed the study.

Categories: Controvery | Leave a comment

Create a free website or blog at